"Consumers should be able to decide whether banks should cover shortfalls in the first place," said Leslie Parrish, senior researcher at the Center for Responsible Lending. "Otherwise, they're making high-priced loans that consumers haven't asked for and in many cases don't even want."
The public has just over a week left to voice its preference to the Federal Reserve Board, which has set a March 30th deadline for comments on two alternative proposals aimed at giving consumers better protection against abuses in unauthorized overdraft fees.
The better of the two alternatives would require banks to obtain permission from customers before charging them overdraft fees on ATM and certain debit card transactions. Though broader protections would still be needed, this opt-in alternative would begin to give consumers a true choice about when and how they are assessed charges and fees for short-term credit. The other, opt-out alternative would do little to change current practices, which amount to a system of abusive short-term loans that strip nearly $17.5 billion from consumers annually.
The survey, conducted by market research firm Macro International, Inc., found that 2 out of 3 consumers prefer being asked if they want to opt in to an overdraft program, rather than being enrolled automatically. .
Specifically, the survey confirms that a majority of consumers - 83 percent - want to choose whether their bank account will be given overdraft protection on debit card purchases and ATM transactions. It also finds that a vast majority of those who want a choice - 80 percent - prefer the opt-in alternative, namely, that their bank or credit union ask their permission before enrolling them in an overdraft program.
This new survey confirms that financial institutions should be required to get explicit permission before enrolling bank account holders in an overdraft system.. Being given the real choice of whether to opt in is an essential step to providing account holders real protection.